UNDERSTANDING TRUMP’S PROPOSED “MERIT-BASED” IMMIGRATION SYSTEM

UNDERSTANDING TRUMP’S PROPOSED “MERIT-BASED” IMMIGRATION SYSTEM

By Edward Shulman (321 words)
Posted in Immigration Law on March 30, 2017

There are (0) comments.

Political forecasters are predicting that, if immigration reform were to take place in any formalized capacity during the Trump administration, there would be an extreme ideological shift in the way the immigration system functions.  Historically, for the last half century, the primary basis of entry was for familial unification/re-unification, where preference was given to those individuals with relatives who are U.S. citizens.  The merit-based system proposed by Trump and certain members of the GOP would essentially upend the family-preference approach in favor of a system that focuses instead on prioritizing highly-skilled immigrants.

Restrictionists believe that this approach will serve the dual purpose of lowering immigration rates and that the highly skilled workers will not drain public assistance programs.  Critics of the merit-based program and pro-immigrant advocates alike stress the fact that an approach that prioritizes highly educated and highly-skilled workers could actually have a paradoxical effect. In particular, they suggest that this system could hurt the U.S. economy by harming businesses reliant on low-skill immigration labor.  In this model that deliberately excludes immigrants working in agricultural industries, labor costs would rise, which may boost worker wages but would adversely impact employers and increase prices for consumers. 

Critics of the merit-based system also highlight concerns about the morality of an elitist approach that only allows entry to a group of already advantaged individuals and one which places a value judgment on type of work, with a message that some workers are more important or of higher value than others.  Immigration Attorney Edward Shulman, Esq. said in an interview in front of the Elmwood Park, New Jersey library on Friday: “To me, there should be no difference in value or merit between an agricultural worker picking oranges in the fields and an information technology expert working in a cubicle.  Both workers are necessary to the fabric of our economy and in my office, they are treated with equal respect.”

Comments (0)

no comments posted

Leave a comment

* denotes required field
* Email will not be published
* Used to help prevent spam

Text only, html will be removed from comment

To make the long story short - I wouldn't be here now writing this review if it wasn't for him. He fought with me and for me as if he was defending himself and not some stranger from a foreign country. I will highly recommend him - if your case has any chance at all he is the one you need.

-Immigration Client

Breaking News

PRESIDENT TRUMP CONSIDERING NEW VERSION OF THE RAISE ACT

Two Republican Senators, Tom Cotton of Arkansas and David Perdue of Georgia met with President Trump on Tuesday to discuss a revised and expanded version of their RAISE Act, which they initially presented in March.  RAISE is an acronym for Reforming...

read more

SENATORS GRAHAM AND DURBIN INTRODUCE BI-PARTISAN DREAM ACT OF 2017

The future of the DACA program hangs in the balance. The Governor of Idaho and ten Attorney Generals, including South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, have issued a deadline calling for President Trump to rescind DACA by September 5th or they will...

read more

UNLAWFUL VOTING IS A DEPORTABLE OFFENSE

Only United States Citizens are permitted to vote.  Under the current immigration laws, non-U.S. citizens (lawful permanent residents/green card holders, undocumented immigrants, asylees, and refugees) are not eligible to vote in any federal, state,...

read more
© 2015 The Shulman Law Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website Design by Hudson