Proof that Noncitizen Knew of Fraud in Asylum Application Is Not Required

Date: July 2, 2014

By: Shulman Law Group

The BIA held that the Department of Homeland Security is not required to establish that a noncitizen knew of the fraud in the application in order to terminate a grant of asylum. However, to terminate the asylum grant, DHS must nevertheless separately prove by a preponderance of the evidence that there was fraud in the asylum application and the fraud was such that the noncitizen was not eligible for asylum at the time it was granted. Matter of P-S-H-, 26 I&N Dec. 329 (BIA 2014).

To make the long story short - I wouldn't be here now writing this review if it wasn't for him. He fought with me and for me as if he was defending himself and not some stranger from a foreign country. I will highly recommend him - if your case has any chance at all he is the one you need.

-Immigration Client

Breaking News

MULTI-STATE DACA LAWSUIT AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

New York Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, along with 15 other Attorneys General from around the country and the District of Columbia formally filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration yesterday due to the termination of the DACA program. ...

read more

TRUMP ENDS DACA: WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

Yesterday, the Trump administration formally announced the end to DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), a program that has protected from deportation an estimated 800,000 young documented immigrations brought to the United States as...

read more

PRESIDENT TRUMP CONSIDERING NEW VERSION OF THE RAISE ACT

Two Republican Senators, Tom Cotton of Arkansas and David Perdue of Georgia met with President Trump on Tuesday to discuss a revised and expanded version of their RAISE Act, which they initially presented in March.  RAISE is an acronym for Reforming...

read more
© 2015 The Shulman Law Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website Design by Hudson