TOP COMPANIES FILE OPPOSITION TO TRUMP'S IMMIGRATION BAN

TOP COMPANIES FILE OPPOSITION TO TRUMP'S IMMIGRATION BAN

By Edward Shulman (396 words)
Posted in Immigration Law on February 06, 2017

There are (0) comments.

Apple, Facebook, Google, Uber, Spotify, Netflix, and Kickstarter are just a few among 97 of the United States' most influential and dynamic companies who have officially filed an "Amicus Brief" in the State of Washington, as opposition to President Trump's Executive Order on Immigration.  The order, signed on January 27, suspended for 90 days entry of immigrants and non-immigrants into the United States from the following seven countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

An Amicus Brief is a legal document filed in appellate court cases by non-litigants where issues of public national interest, such as social questions or civil liberties, are being debated.  .The intention of the brief is to advise the court of critical and noteworthy information and to call the court's attention to the potential deleterious societal consequences of the case that the court might wish to consider when rendering an opinion.  In the instant case, the 97 companies are seeking to demonstrate, through their Amicus Brief, that President Trump's Executive Order, which is widely considered a Muslim Ban, has significantly disrupted their business operations and is making it more "difficult and expensive for U.S. companies to hire, recruit, and retain some of the world's best employees." 

The Amicus Brief was issued in support of the State of Washington wherein the state's Attorney General, Bob Ferguson, has been spearheading a compelling campaign against the executive order, citing it as both "unlawful and unconstitutional."  On Friday, District Court Senior Judge James L. Robart granted a temporary restraining order on the travel restrictions, which the federal government asked the appeals court to stay through an emergency motion.

New Jersey-based Immigration Attorney Edward Shulman of The Shulman Law Group said in an interview "On behalf of my Muslim clients from the seven countries implicated, I applaud the efforts of the 97 companies in filing the Amicus Brief.  I should also like to highlight the profound psychological and familial toll the ban would cause, in addition to the adverse business and economic impact."  Mr. Shulman also posited the likelihood that the case would end up before the United States Supreme Court.

Comments (0)

no comments posted

Leave a comment

* denotes required field
* Email will not be published
* Used to help prevent spam

Text only, html will be removed from comment

To make the long story short - I wouldn't be here now writing this review if it wasn't for him. He fought with me and for me as if he was defending himself and not some stranger from a foreign country. I will highly recommend him - if your case has any chance at all he is the one you need.

-Immigration Client

Breaking News

SENATE REPUBLICANS PROPOSE THE "SUCCEED ACT": DACA REPLACEMENT BILL

In response to President Trump's disbanding of the DACA program, two Republican Senators, James Lankford of Oklahoma and Tom Tillis of North Carolina, unveiled a proposed bill this week which is being touted as a "conservative" approach to protecting...

read more

MULTI-STATE DACA LAWSUIT AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

New York Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, along with 15 other Attorneys General from around the country and the District of Columbia formally filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration yesterday due to the termination of the DACA program. ...

read more

TRUMP ENDS DACA: WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

Yesterday, the Trump administration formally announced the end to DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), a program that has protected from deportation an estimated 800,000 young documented immigrations brought to the United States as...

read more
© 2015 The Shulman Law Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website Design by Hudson