SUPREME COURT GRANTS SECOND CHANCE TO IMMIGRANT FACING DEPORTATION

SUPREME COURT GRANTS SECOND CHANCE TO IMMIGRANT FACING DEPORTATION

By Edward Shulman (352 words)
Posted in Immigration Law on June 26, 2017

There are (0) comments.

On Friday, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of a lawful permanent resident who received faulty immigration advice from an attorney.  Indeed, the Justices, in a 6-2 decision, concluded that it was reasonable to think that a green card holder, named Jae Lee, could have avoided deportation if his attorney had not incorrectly advised him that pleading guilty to a drug charge would not lead to his deportation. The attorney's injudicious guidance regarding the immigration consequences of criminal charges, referred to as a Strickland claim or simply as "ineffective assistance of counsel," placed Mr. Lee at risk for deportation.  Consequently, the Justices are affording Mr. Lee, a successful business owner who has been lawfully residing in the United States for 35 years, another opportunity to prove the merits of his case in trial with effective assistance.

In an interview about the Supreme Court decision, noted immigration attorney, Edward Shulman, Esq. states "this is a constitutional victory because everyone has the right to effective counsel.  The case is likewise a cautionary tale about the import of finding the right immigration attorney who will be able to skillfully and knowledgeably advise clients regarding the potential immigration consequences of criminal charges and sentences."  Mr. Shulman explained how many criminal attorneys are unaware that certain offenses, plea deals, and sentences, place an immigrant at risk for deportation, even if he or she is a valid and long-time green card holder.  He further explicated that in some cases, a criminal attorney may focus on minimizing prison time when actually trading more prison time could mean that the client could remain in the United States after incarceration.  Shulman states "in my practice, I work closely with criminal attorneys to educate them about the immigration-criminal interplay before they go to trial so that an appropriate strategy is utilized to minimize adverse impact on one's immigration status in the United States."

Comments (0)

no comments posted

Leave a comment

* denotes required field
* Email will not be published
* Used to help prevent spam

Text only, html will be removed from comment

To make the long story short - I wouldn't be here now writing this review if it wasn't for him. He fought with me and for me as if he was defending himself and not some stranger from a foreign country. I will highly recommend him - if your case has any chance at all he is the one you need.

-Immigration Client

Breaking News

FEDERAL COURT ORDERS DHS TO MAINTAIN DACA PROGRAM

Following the Trump Administration's announcement that they would terminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program set forth by President Obama via Executive Order, the University of California filed a formal legal complaint...

read more

TRUMP TERMINATES TPS FOR 200,000 EL SALVADORANS

A profound sense of demoralization and dread has gripped El Salvadorans, their families, their employers, and their communities across the United States today.  In President Trump's latest reversal of immigration policies that seek to terminate...

read more

GOVERNOR-ELECT PHIL MURPHY'S VISION FOR 2018 IMMIGRATION IN NEW JERSEY

The political landscape for immigrants in 2017 under Trump was bleak, with widespread anticipatory anxiety regarding the fate of DREAMers, TPS recipients, individuals from Muslim backgrounds, beneficiaries of chain migration, and the undocumented...

read more
© 2015 The Shulman Law Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website Design by Hudson