PRO-IMMIGRATION INITIATIVES AT THE STATE AND LOCAL LEVELS

PRO-IMMIGRATION INITIATIVES AT THE STATE AND LOCAL LEVELS

By Edward Shulman (586 words)
Posted in Immigration Law on September 13, 2016

There are (0) comments.

With congressional and executive actions stalled, and given the current political climate with contentious immigration debates, the question that is often asked is if immigration reform will ever be possible.  Given years of federal inaction in Washington, it appears that changes will, at least in the short run, have to occur at the State and local levels.  Many immigration advocates have expressed concern that our country has been too fixated on an immigration reform strategy at the federal government level and that smaller steps may first need to be taken within a State-based approach.  The hope is that increased momentum at the local level will translate into future political support for comprehensive immigration reform. Indeed, it is suggested that even if Hillary Clinton, who is decidedly pro-immigration reform, were to be elected President, the ongoing political battles at the national level may prevent the passing of wide-ranging legislation, beyond executive action programs.

Within the paradigm of a State-based approach, there appears to be three tiers of States that have already demonstrated an interest in and a commitment to implementing pro-integration measures.  The State of California sits alone in the top tier as it has done the most to offer stronger protections and greater rights in integrating its immigrant population, providing benefits such as access to professional licenses, in-State tuition, financial aid, and child health-care benefits. In addition, an alliance of insurance companies, agricultural businesses, and religious institutions advocated for and helped facilitate the passage of the California’s driver's license law, known as AB-60, which allows undocumented immigrants to apply for a driver's license with the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). The law expressly states that no one may discriminate against a holder of an AB-60 license, or use the driver's license to attempt to question the holder's citizenship or immigration status. California also passed a law extending eligibility for Medi-Cal benefits to children under 19 who do not have immigration status and thus do not qualify for benefits under the Federal Medicaid Program. Noteworthy are the facts that these measures have not been subjected to constitutional inquisition and have reportedly helped the State's economic situation.

The second tier of States, which includes Connecticut, Illinois, and Washington, have shown evidence of providing several types of benefits to immigrants that are currently unavailable at the federal level.  This includes providing health care to undocumented children and pregnant women. In addition, Connecticut has passed laws allowing undocumented residents access to drivers' licenses and in-State tuition for public universities, and has limited State cooperation on deportations involving minor offenses, choosing a productive versus punitive approach.

The final tier, which is comprised of New Jersey, New York, and Massachusetts, is known as the immigration-friendly group of States. While they have not yet passed any official pro-immigrant policies or measures, there is a strong push by business leaders, Democratic lawmakers, and advocates for immigration policy changes that are reportedly in the pipeline.

At the Shulman Law Group, an immigration law firm located in New Jersey, our immigration attorneys and staff are dedicated to advocating for the rights and protections of our immigration clients.  It is our hope that New Jersey will follow the lead of States like California, Connecticut, Illinois, and Washington in implementing pro-integration measures and policies.

Comments (0)

no comments posted

Leave a comment

* denotes required field
* Email will not be published
* Used to help prevent spam

Text only, html will be removed from comment

To make the long story short - I wouldn't be here now writing this review if it wasn't for him. He fought with me and for me as if he was defending himself and not some stranger from a foreign country. I will highly recommend him - if your case has any chance at all he is the one you need.

-Immigration Client

Breaking News

SENATE REPUBLICANS PROPOSE THE "SUCCEED ACT": DACA REPLACEMENT BILL

In response to President Trump's disbanding of the DACA program, two Republican Senators, James Lankford of Oklahoma and Tom Tillis of North Carolina, unveiled a proposed bill this week which is being touted as a "conservative" approach to protecting...

read more

MULTI-STATE DACA LAWSUIT AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

New York Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, along with 15 other Attorneys General from around the country and the District of Columbia formally filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration yesterday due to the termination of the DACA program. ...

read more

TRUMP ENDS DACA: WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

Yesterday, the Trump administration formally announced the end to DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), a program that has protected from deportation an estimated 800,000 young documented immigrations brought to the United States as...

read more
© 2015 The Shulman Law Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website Design by Hudson