JAMAICAN WOMAN WINS, THEN LOSES, HER FIGHT AGAINST REMOVAL

JAMAICAN WOMAN WINS, THEN LOSES, HER FIGHT AGAINST REMOVAL

By Edward Shulman (553 words)
Posted in Immigration Law on September 04, 2014

There are (0) comments.

An appeal of several lower court immigration decisions concerning whether a woman from Jamaica who came to the United States legally could stay in the country eventually turned out unfavorably for her. Four years after she came to the country in 1985, she was charged with certain retail theft offenses in Pennsylvania for which she received a sentence which could range from three to twenty-three months as a repeat offender when she tendered a plea to misdemeanor theft. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a) of the Federal Code, conviction of an aggravated felony is a ground for mandatory removal of the person convicted, where that person came to the United States on a temporary visa.

The United States sought to have her removed from the country on the basis that her conviction did constitute such an aggravated felony. Initially the Immigration Judge ruled her convictions did not fall in that category rejecting the argument that these offenses were convictions involving moral turpitude.   The Judge concluded that she was eligible for cancellation of her removal status as the Government failed to meet its burden of establishing these offenses actually were aggravated felonies.

But on appeal the Board of Immigration Appeals initially found and later the United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that lower rulings should be reversed. The BIA ruled that (i) Ms. Dempster had not met her burden of showing that she had not been convicted of an aggravated felony and (ii) the shoplifting convictions had "stopped time" on her aggregate presence in the United States for the purposes of cancellation relief. She asked that the case be reconsidered and even added an additional ground for relief, arguing that she deserved asylum because she feared returning to Jamaica. The appellate courts rejected that argument on the ground it should have been raised during her initial challenge to the removal petition. These courts also concluded that the burden of showing her conviction was not an aggravated felony fell on Ms. Dempster and that designations of what constitutes an “aggravated felony” are not merely determined by referring to state law. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals in Dempster v. Attorney General of the United States, Nos. 13-2431, 13-3273 (3rd. Cir US Ct. App. 2014) found she is subject to removal from the United States.

Although the opinion specifically states it should not be cited for precedential purposes does underscore the importance of preparing all possible arguments at the earliest stages in these contested proceedings. Also it reiterates the importance of temporary residents exercising great care when tendering a guilty plea in a criminal case and seeking legal advice from experienced counsel who can warn them accurately of the consequences of having certain convictions of their record.

The Shulman Law Group endeavors to ensure its clients be kept abreast of all significant developments relating to the process of naturalization to the United States. Edward Shulman, Esq, founder of The Shulman Law Group, LLC is a national speaker for the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA).  AILA is the national association of immigration lawyers established to promote justice, advocate for fair and reasonable immigration law and policy, and to advance the quality of immigration and nationality law and practice.

Comments (0)

no comments posted

Leave a comment

* denotes required field
* Email will not be published
* Used to help prevent spam

Text only, html will be removed from comment

To make the long story short - I wouldn't be here now writing this review if it wasn't for him. He fought with me and for me as if he was defending himself and not some stranger from a foreign country. I will highly recommend him - if your case has any chance at all he is the one you need.

-Immigration Client

Breaking News

SENATE REPUBLICANS PROPOSE THE "SUCCEED ACT": DACA REPLACEMENT BILL

In response to President Trump's disbanding of the DACA program, two Republican Senators, James Lankford of Oklahoma and Tom Tillis of North Carolina, unveiled a proposed bill this week which is being touted as a "conservative" approach to protecting...

read more

MULTI-STATE DACA LAWSUIT AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

New York Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, along with 15 other Attorneys General from around the country and the District of Columbia formally filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration yesterday due to the termination of the DACA program. ...

read more

TRUMP ENDS DACA: WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

Yesterday, the Trump administration formally announced the end to DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), a program that has protected from deportation an estimated 800,000 young documented immigrations brought to the United States as...

read more
© 2015 The Shulman Law Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website Design by Hudson